Outsiders: Book vs. Movie—7 Shocking Differences You Missed!

From Page to Screen: Unveiling the Transformation of The Outsiders

S.E. Hinton’s The Outsiders captured the hearts and minds of a generation, its raw portrayal of teenage angst and social division resonating deeply with readers. The subsequent film adaptation, directed by Francis Ford Coppola, brought this iconic story to a wider audience, solidifying its place in popular culture.

Acknowledging the Enduring Legacy

Both the novel and the movie hold significant cultural weight. The Outsiders remains a staple in classrooms, sparking discussions about class, identity, and belonging.

The film, boasting a star-studded cast, introduced the story to a new generation, further cementing its status as a coming-of-age classic.

The Inevitable Discrepancies of Adaptation

Adapting a beloved book for the screen is always a delicate balancing act. While filmmakers strive to remain true to the source material, changes are often necessary due to the different mediums.

Narrative shifts, character alterations, and thematic compressions can occur, leading to discrepancies that may surprise even the most ardent fans.

Unearthing Seven Shocking Differences

This analysis delves into seven significant differences between the book and the movie, offering insights for those who have experienced either – or both – versions of The Outsiders.

These are not mere nitpicks, but rather substantial alterations that impact the narrative, character development, and overall message. Get ready to have your perspective challenged as we dissect the nuances of this timeless story.

Prepare to uncover aspects of the film that you may have never noticed, and to rediscover the depth and complexity of Hinton’s original vision.

Adapting a novel to film involves more than just translating scenes; it requires a fundamental shift in how the story is conveyed. Literature relies heavily on internal monologue to reveal a character’s thoughts and feelings, offering readers a direct line to their inner world. The absence of this inner voice in a movie can significantly alter the audience’s perception and connection to the protagonist.

Difference #1: The Depth of Ponyboy’s Internal Monologue

One of the most striking differences between S.E. Hinton’s The Outsiders and Francis Ford Coppola’s film adaptation lies in the treatment of Ponyboy’s internal monologue. The novel thrives on Ponyboy’s first-person narration, providing readers with unparalleled access to his thoughts, fears, and evolving understanding of the world around him. The film, constrained by its visual medium, necessarily reduces this internal landscape, which impacts the audience’s connection to Ponyboy.

The Power of First-Person Narration in the Novel

The Outsiders novel is primarily told through Ponyboy’s distinctive voice. Readers aren’t merely witnessing the events unfolding in Tulsa, Oklahoma, they are experiencing them through his eyes. His narration allows us to delve into his intellectual curiosity, his love for literature and movies, and his struggle to reconcile his identity as a Greaser with his aspirations beyond it.

His detailed observations, philosophical musings, and poignant reflections form the backbone of the novel, shaping our understanding of the characters and the complex social dynamics at play. The first-person perspective ensures that the story’s emotional core remains intimately connected to Ponyboy’s personal journey.

The Simplification of Narration in the Film

The film adaptation simplifies or removes much of Ponyboy’s internal narration. While a voice-over is present at times, it serves mainly to propel the plot or offer brief explanations of the settings or circumstances.

It doesn’t capture the depth of introspection or the nuanced emotional landscape that defines Ponyboy’s character in the book. The film relies more on visual cues, dialogue, and the performances of the actors to convey Ponyboy’s emotional state.

This shift in narrative style has a tangible impact on how we perceive and relate to Ponyboy.

Impact on Character Development and Audience Connection

The reduction of Ponyboy’s internal monologue in the film alters character development and the audience’s connection to him. In the novel, we empathize with Ponyboy not just because of what happens to him, but because of what happens within him. We witness his internal struggles, his moral dilemmas, and his gradual maturation as he grapples with loss, violence, and social injustice.

By limiting access to these internal processes, the film creates a certain distance between the audience and Ponyboy. He becomes more of a passive observer in his own story, rather than the active, introspective narrator we encounter in the book. This can diminish the emotional resonance of his experiences and weaken our overall investment in his character arc.

Examples of Omitted Internal Thoughts

Numerous examples of internal thoughts that are omitted from the film highlight the extent of this narrative shift. One instance is Ponyboy’s detailed reflections on the sunsets, which symbolize beauty and connection in a world often defined by division. These introspective moments reveal his sensitive nature and his yearning for something beyond the confines of his social circumstances.

In the book, Ponyboy contemplates the meaning of the Robert Frost poem "Nothing Gold Can Stay" even before Johnny’s death. This foreshadowing provides insight into Ponyboy’s evolving perspective, as he begins to understand the fleeting nature of innocence and the inevitability of change. The film touches on the poem, but doesn’t delve into the depth of Ponyboy’s analysis, diminishing its impact.

Another notable omission involves Ponyboy’s complex feelings towards Darry, his older brother and guardian. In the book, Ponyboy frequently wrestles with his perception of Darry as stern and unfeeling. We see his internal struggle to understand Darry’s sacrifices and appreciate his unwavering commitment to keeping the family together. The film portrays Darry’s tough exterior, but it doesn’t fully explore Ponyboy’s internal conflict and eventual realization of Darry’s love.

Adapting a novel to film involves more than just translating scenes; it requires a fundamental shift in how the story is conveyed. Literature relies heavily on internal monologue to reveal a character’s thoughts and feelings, offering readers a direct line to their inner world. The absence of this inner voice in a movie can significantly alter the audience’s perception and connection to the protagonist.

Difference #1 explored the depth of Ponyboy’s internal monologue in the novel versus its reduced presence in the film. While the inner thoughts of the protagonist offer a unique experience in the book, the shift to a visual medium impacts other critical scenes as well. This difference is particularly apparent when we consider the rumble, a pivotal moment of confrontation, and a crucial turning point in the narrative.

Difference #2: The Intensity of the Rumble

The rumble serves as the climactic showdown between the Greasers and the Socs. It’s a raw, visceral event representing the culmination of simmering tensions and class conflict. Examining how this scene is portrayed in the book versus the movie reveals significant differences in its atmosphere, violence, and overall significance.

The Rumble in the Novel: A Chaotic Clash

In S.E. Hinton’s novel, the buildup to the rumble is thick with anticipation and dread. Ponyboy’s narration captures the emotional turmoil and uncertainty felt by the Greasers as they prepare for the fight.

The rumble itself is portrayed as a chaotic and brutal brawl.

The reader experiences the confusion, the pain, and the sheer desperation of the moment through Ponyboy’s eyes.

Hinton doesn’t shy away from the violence.

She emphasizes the raw physicality and the potential for serious injury.

The novel provides a sense of realism, highlighting the desperation and the lack of clear-cut victory.

The Movie’s Visual Interpretation of the Rumble

Francis Ford Coppola’s film offers a visual interpretation of the rumble. This is where the choreography, cinematography, and editing play a key role. The movie presents a more stylized and visually dynamic depiction of the fight.

The rain-soaked setting adds to the drama, enhancing the visual impact of the punches and clashes.

The movie emphasizes the athleticism and aggression of the combatants.

However, this visual spectacle sometimes comes at the expense of the raw, emotional weight found in the book.

Contrasting Intensity: Book vs. Film

While the film offers a visually exciting portrayal of the rumble, the novel captures the internal chaos and emotional stakes with greater depth.

The book’s focus on Ponyboy’s perspective creates a more intimate and unsettling experience for the reader. We are privy to his fear, his moral conflicts, and his growing disillusionment with violence.

In contrast, the film’s broader perspective and emphasis on action can somewhat dilute the emotional impact.

The choreography in the movie, while impressive, can sometimes feel staged. It diminishes the sense of genuine danger and desperation.

The intensity is changed from the feeling of the moment, to the perception of the moment.

Consequences and Aftermath

The consequences of the rumble also differ subtly between the two mediums. Both versions depict the Greasers’ victory. But the novel delves deeper into the moral implications and the emptiness that follows.

Ponyboy’s realization that violence is not a solution is more pronounced in the book.

The movie, while acknowledging the victory, tends to focus more on the immediate aftermath.

Specifically, Johnny’s deteriorating condition, which acts as a more direct emotional catalyst.

The subtle shift in emphasis alters the audience’s takeaway.

The book creates a deeper understanding of the futility of violence and the need for empathy.

Adapting a novel to film involves more than just translating scenes; it requires a fundamental shift in how the story is conveyed. Literature relies heavily on internal monologue to reveal a character’s thoughts and feelings, offering readers a direct line to their inner world. The absence of this inner voice in a movie can significantly alter the audience’s perception and connection to the protagonist.

Difference #1 explored the depth of Ponyboy’s internal monologue in the novel versus its reduced presence in the film. While the inner thoughts of the protagonist offer a unique experience in the book, the shift to a visual medium impacts other critical scenes as well. This difference is particularly apparent when we consider the rumble, a pivotal moment of confrontation, and a crucial turning point in the narrative.

Difference #2 highlighted the intensity of the rumble between the Greasers and the Socs as rendered in both formats. From the anticipation leading up to it to the raw violence of the clash itself, the film presents a different experience than the book. As we continue to explore these deviations, another key character emerges where book and film diverge.

Difference #3: Cherry Valance’s Character Nuances

Cherry Valance, the Soc cheerleader who dares to see beyond the superficial labels of "Greasers" and "Socs," is a pivotal character in The Outsiders. Her motivations and complex relationships—particularly with Ponyboy and Bob—drive much of the story’s emotional core.

However, the transition from page to screen invariably leads to a streamlining of character arcs. Examining how Cherry is portrayed in the film reveals some intriguing simplifications and amplifications that subtly alter her impact on the narrative.

Cherry’s Role and Motivations in the Novel

In S.E. Hinton’s novel, Cherry’s motivations are multifaceted. She is drawn to the Greasers, particularly Ponyboy, because she sees a sensitivity and depth lacking in her own social circle. She’s searching for something real, something beyond the superficiality of the Soc lifestyle.

Cherry is conflicted, torn between her loyalty to her friends and her growing affection for Ponyboy.

She feels guilt over Bob’s behavior and recognizes the injustice of the social divide.

This internal conflict is a defining characteristic of her portrayal. Her willingness to help the Greasers, to act as a spy, stems from a genuine desire to atone for Bob’s actions and bridge the gap between the two groups.

Cherry’s Portrayal in the Film

The movie adaptation, while largely faithful to the plot, tends to present a somewhat simplified version of Cherry. Her interactions with Ponyboy retain their charm, but her internal struggles are less pronounced.

The film captures her beauty and her initial defiance of Soc expectations, but the nuances of her guilt and her complex relationship with Bob are often glossed over.

Her motivations appear more directly tied to her attraction to Ponyboy and her desire to avenge Bob’s death, rather than a deeper questioning of her own social group and its values.

Internal Conflicts, Loyalties, and Overall Impact

One of the key differences lies in the portrayal of Cherry’s loyalties.

In the book, her loyalty is constantly tested, creating internal turmoil. She feels responsible for Bob’s actions and torn between her Soc friends and her connection with Ponyboy.

The film, while acknowledging her grief for Bob, often portrays her actions as driven more by revenge or a need for justice rather than a complex web of conflicting emotions.

This subtle shift impacts her overall role in the story. In the novel, Cherry serves as a moral compass, challenging both the Greasers and the Socs to see beyond their stereotypes. In the film, while still a sympathetic character, she becomes more of a catalyst for Ponyboy’s emotional journey.

Specific Examples of Dialogue and Scenes

Several key scenes highlight these nuances. For example, in the book, Cherry explicitly states, "I’m not sure I could take it after Bob Sheldon. I could never look at him again." This reveals the depth of her guilt and the profound impact Bob’s death has on her.

This sentiment is less emphasized in the film, where her grief feels more directly tied to her personal loss than to a sense of responsibility.

Similarly, her interactions with Ponyboy after Bob’s death demonstrate a different dynamic. In the book, Cherry is more vulnerable, more willing to expose her own flaws and insecurities.

In the film, she maintains a greater emotional distance, presenting a more composed and less conflicted persona.

The iconic drive-in movie scene offers a key point of comparison. While the scene is beautifully rendered in the movie, capturing the initial spark between Ponyboy and Cherry, the subsequent dialogue is truncated.

Subtle but important lines are removed, reducing the depth of Cherry’s character and the underlying tensions between the two groups.

Difference #4: The Significance of Johnny’s Letter

While the narrative’s visual elements certainly command attention, the written word retains significant power, particularly within The Outsiders.

Johnny’s letter to Ponyboy, penned in his final moments, represents a crucial turning point in the novel. But, the transition to film raises a critical question: How does this pivotal piece of correspondence translate, and what impact does its adaptation (or absence) have on the story’s overall message?

The Weight of Words: Johnny’s Message in the Novel

In S.E. Hinton’s The Outsiders, Johnny’s letter serves as his last will and testament, a final expression of his understanding of the world.

Addressed to Ponyboy, the letter implores him to stay gold, a reference to Robert Frost’s poem "Nothing Gold Can Stay".

Johnny urges Ponyboy to retain his innocence and optimism despite the harsh realities they face.

The letter reveals Johnny’s profound realization that their sacrifice – saving the children from the burning church – was not in vain.

He argues that their lives, though tragically short, had meaning because they prevented greater loss.

This realization represents a significant shift in Johnny’s character, moving him from a fearful, damaged boy to one who finds purpose in his final act.

Moreover, the letter inspires Ponyboy to share their story and to advocate for understanding and empathy between the Greasers and the Socs.

It’s the catalyst that sets Ponyboy on the path to writing The Outsiders itself.

A Missed Opportunity: The Letter’s Portrayal in the Film

Unlike the book, the movie adaptation takes a different approach with Johnny’s letter.

While the letter is present, its impact is arguably lessened. The film depicts Ponyboy reading the letter, but the scene lacks the emotional depth and transformative power found in the novel.

The film doesn’t fully capture the nuance and emotional weight of Johnny’s written words.

The film doesn’t showcase the full context of Johnny’s realization about “staying gold” and the necessity of their sacrifice.

The film sacrifices the opportunity to drive home its important themes.

Lost in Translation: Analyzing the Differences

The discrepancy between the book and the movie highlights the challenge of translating internal reflections to a visual medium.

While film can depict action and emotion through visuals, it often struggles to convey the complex thoughts and feelings that are readily accessible in literature.

In the novel, Johnny’s letter is a powerful, introspective moment that allows the reader to connect deeply with his character.

In the film, the letter is reduced to a plot device, a means of conveying information rather than a catalyst for profound change.

The absence of the letter’s full emotional impact diminishes the film’s overall message, particularly concerning the importance of empathy, understanding, and the preservation of innocence.

Symbolic Significance: The Letter’s Enduring Power

Beyond its literal content, Johnny’s letter holds significant symbolic weight.

It represents the power of words to transcend physical limitations and to inspire change. It underscores the importance of perspective and the ability to find meaning even in the face of tragedy.

The letter’s absence, or diminished presence, in the film arguably weakens the story’s overall message.

The message is about the importance of communication, understanding, and the enduring power of hope.

By not fully embracing the letter’s power, the movie adaptation misses an opportunity to connect with audiences on a deeper, more meaningful level.

Difference #5: The Book’s Deeper Exploration of Socioeconomic Issues

Having explored the impact of Johnny’s letter and its adaptation to film, it’s impossible to ignore a crucial element woven into the fabric of The Outsiders: the stark socioeconomic divide between the Greasers and the Socs. While the film captures the surface-level conflict, the novel delves far deeper, exploring the systemic inequalities that shape the characters’ lives and fuel the animosity between the gangs. The result is a more nuanced and ultimately more impactful commentary on class, privilege, and the cyclical nature of poverty.

The Novel: A Stark Portrait of Economic Disparity

Hinton’s novel doesn’t shy away from depicting the harsh realities faced by the Greasers.

They are defined not only by their hairstyles and social status but also by their economic circumstances.

They live in rundown neighborhoods, struggle to make ends meet, and often lack access to basic resources and opportunities.

This economic deprivation directly impacts their choices, their futures, and their worldview.

Characters like Ponyboy, Soda, and Darry are constantly aware of their limited options, forced to confront adult responsibilities far too early.

Their lack of privilege shapes their relationships, their aspirations, and their very identities.

The novel provides an explicit social commentary.

The Film: A Simplified Class Conflict

The film adaptation, while visually compelling, tends to gloss over the complexities of the socioeconomic landscape.

While the visual cues of poverty are present – the dilapidated houses, the worn-out clothing – the underlying causes and consequences are less explicitly explored.

The film frequently relies on visual signifiers to portray economic disparity.

The nuance of the novel’s depiction gets flattened in favor of a more straightforward portrayal of gang rivalry.

The impact of poverty on the characters’ internal lives and their relationships with each other is less evident, resulting in a somewhat superficial understanding of the conflict.

Omissions and Their Impact

Several key elements that underscore the socioeconomic disparities in the book are minimized or omitted in the film.

For example, the constant worry about money that plagues the Curtis brothers is less pronounced.

The struggle to afford basic necessities and the sacrifices Darry makes to keep the family together are not as emphasized.

Furthermore, the novel highlights the systemic barriers that prevent the Greasers from escaping their circumstances, such as limited educational opportunities and the prejudice they face from society.

These factors are largely absent from the film, reducing the conflict to a matter of gang affiliation rather than a consequence of deeply entrenched inequality.

Specific Examples from the Book

Several scenes and passages in the book vividly illustrate the socioeconomic realities of the Greasers.

Ponyboy’s description of his neighborhood, with its broken windows and graffiti-covered walls, paints a stark picture of urban decay.

The scene where Darry works tirelessly to support his brothers, sacrificing his own dreams of college, underscores the burden of responsibility placed upon him by their economic situation.

The contrast between the Greasers’ meager possessions and the Socs’ affluent lifestyle is also highlighted throughout the novel, emphasizing the vast chasm that separates them.

These details, while present in the film to some extent, lack the depth and emotional resonance they possess in the book, diminishing the overall impact of the story’s social commentary.

Having explored the impact of Johnny’s letter and its adaptation to film, it’s impossible to ignore a crucial element woven into the fabric of The Outsiders: the stark socioeconomic divide between the Greasers and the Socs. While the film captures the surface-level conflict, the novel delves far deeper, exploring the systemic inequalities that shape the characters’ lives and fuel the animosity between the gangs. The result is a more nuanced and ultimately more impactful commentary on class, privilege, and the cyclical nature of poverty.

With the backdrop of social disparity established, the narrative thrust hinges greatly on the characters it envelops, particularly Dallas "Dally" Winston. Understanding Dally requires digging beneath his hardened exterior, an exercise the novel undertakes with far greater dedication than its cinematic counterpart.

Difference #6: Unmasking Dally – Backstory and Hidden Depths

Dally Winston. The name itself evokes images of a hardened, street-smart hoodlum, a product of his environment and a volatile force within the Greaser gang.

While the film adaptation presents Dally as a charismatic rebel, the novel provides a richer, more nuanced portrayal of his character, delving into his past and revealing the motivations behind his often-destructive behavior.

Dally in the Novel: A Product of a Brutal World

S.E. Hinton’s novel paints a vivid picture of Dally’s early life, marked by hardship and neglect. He hails from New York City, a place where survival is a daily struggle, and compassion is a luxury few can afford.

Dally’s experiences in the city shaped him into a tough, cynical individual.

He’s been arrested multiple times, witnessed unspeakable violence, and learned to rely on his instincts to survive. This harsh upbringing explains his mistrust of authority, his disregard for rules, and his tendency to resort to violence.

The novel highlights Dally’s deep-seated vulnerability, masked by his aggressive demeanor. His tough exterior is a defense mechanism, a way to protect himself from further pain and disappointment.

The Film’s Portrayal: A Simplified Rebel

The film captures Dally’s rebellious spirit and his loyalty to the Greasers, but it often sacrifices depth for spectacle. Matt Dillon delivers a compelling performance, but the screenplay doesn’t fully explore the character’s backstory or the reasons behind his actions.

The film hints at Dally’s troubled past, but it doesn’t delve into the specifics of his experiences in New York or the trauma he endured. As a result, his behavior sometimes appears erratic or unjustified.

The audience sees his toughness and his willingness to break the law, but they don’t fully understand the pain and vulnerability that drive him.

Key Differences: Omissions and Alterations

Several key details from the novel are omitted or altered in the film, further simplifying Dally’s character. For example, the novel emphasizes Dally’s genuine affection for Johnny Cade, portraying him as a surrogate older brother figure.

This bond is present in the film, but its intensity is somewhat diminished.

The novel also explores Dally’s feelings of isolation and his inability to connect with others on a deeper level. He longs for acceptance and love, but he struggles to overcome his past and trust those around him.

This internal conflict is less apparent in the film, making Dally appear more one-dimensional.

Examining Omitted Scenes and Details

One of the most significant omissions is the lack of detail regarding Dally’s past in New York. The novel provides glimpses into his life on the streets, his encounters with violence, and his experiences with the law. These details are crucial for understanding his cynicism and his desperate need for belonging.

Another notable difference is the way the film handles Dally’s death. In the novel, his suicide is a direct result of Johnny’s death, a final act of despair fueled by the loss of the one person he truly loved.

The film portrays his death as a more impulsive act, driven by grief and rage, but without fully conveying the depth of his emotional pain.

By omitting these crucial details, the film reduces Dally to a caricature of a troubled youth, failing to capture the complexities and contradictions that make him such a compelling character in the novel.

Having explored the impact of Johnny’s letter and its adaptation to film, it’s impossible to ignore a crucial element woven into the fabric of The Outsiders: the stark socioeconomic divide between the Greasers and the Socs. While the film captures the surface-level conflict, the novel delves far deeper, exploring the systemic inequalities that shape the characters’ lives and fuel the animosity between the gangs. The result is a more nuanced and ultimately more impactful commentary on class, privilege, and the cyclical nature of poverty.

With the backdrop of social disparity established, the narrative thrust hinges greatly on the characters it envelops, particularly Dallas "Dally" Winston. Understanding Dally requires digging beneath his hardened exterior, an exercise the novel undertakes with far greater dedication than its cinematic counterpart. However, even after understanding each character’s position and motivation, the denouement shifts perspective once more.

The ending of The Outsiders, both in novel and film form, serves as the culmination of the characters’ journeys and the thematic explorations woven throughout the story. However, the tone, pacing, and ultimate message conveyed differ significantly, leaving audiences with contrasting impressions and takeaways.

The Novel’s Reflective Resolution

S.E. Hinton’s novel concludes with a sense of weary resignation tinged with hope.

Ponyboy, grappling with the deaths of Johnny and Dally, is assigned an English assignment: to write about something that matters to him.

This assignment serves as a meta-narrative device, revealing that the entire novel is Ponyboy’s composition.

The novel ends as it begins, with Ponyboy starting to write, suggesting a cyclical nature to the violence and social issues, but also hinting at the potential for change through understanding and empathy.

The intended message is clear: stories matter. Sharing experiences can foster understanding and break cycles of prejudice and violence.

The novel emphasizes the importance of individual reflection and the power of writing as a means of processing trauma and promoting social change.

The Film’s More Optimistic Note

The film adaptation, while largely faithful to the novel, opts for a more traditionally optimistic ending.

While the deaths of Johnny and Dally are still present, the film places greater emphasis on Ponyboy’s academic success and his apparent acceptance of the events.

The film often concludes with a more visually uplifting scene, perhaps showcasing the sunset or Ponyboy seemingly finding solace in his friendships.

The final message, while still touching upon themes of understanding and empathy, is often less nuanced and more geared towards a sense of closure.

The film seems to suggest that while the pain of loss remains, life goes on, and healing is possible through perseverance and maintaining bonds of friendship.

Disparities in Tone, Pacing, and Emotional Resonance

The most glaring difference lies in the overall tone.

The novel embraces a more melancholic and contemplative atmosphere, allowing the reader to fully absorb the weight of the events and the lasting impact on Ponyboy.

The film, constrained by time and the demands of visual storytelling, often sacrifices this depth for a faster pace and a more accessible emotional experience.

This difference in pacing affects the emotional impact of the ending.

The novel allows readers to dwell on the tragedy, fostering a deeper sense of empathy and understanding.

The film, while emotionally moving, can sometimes feel rushed, preventing the audience from fully processing the complexities of grief and social injustice.

Impact: Thought-Provoking Novel vs. Moving Film

Whether the film’s ending is as thought-provoking or impactful as the novel’s is subjective and depends on individual preferences.

The novel’s ending lingers in the mind, prompting reflection on the cyclical nature of violence, the power of storytelling, and the importance of empathy.

It encourages critical thinking and a deeper engagement with the social issues presented.

The film’s ending, while moving, may offer a more immediate sense of closure and emotional release.

However, it might lack the lasting impact and intellectual stimulation of the novel’s conclusion.

Ultimately, both endings are effective in their own right, catering to different audiences and priorities. The novel prioritizes introspection and social commentary, while the film emphasizes emotional resonance and a more hopeful outlook.

So, next time you’re debating what are some differences from the outsiders book and movie with your friends, remember these points. Hope you enjoyed the deep dive! Let us know in the comments which version you prefer!